Skip to main content

Switch off AI tools without breaking your processes.

An upcoming renewal, a compliance rule, a cost-cutting project — whatever forced the switch, every person on your team gets a white-glove, personalized guide that recreates how they work in the new tool. Nothing breaks, nobody loses their work, and you never become the help desk. Free during beta.

Already know what you’re switching off? Start the migration →

  • No login to start
  • Vendor-neutral — no referral fees
  • We move the workflow, never your data

What the invoice doesn’t show.

On the renewal sheet, switching a tool off looks like a clean subtraction. It isn’t: the work lived inside it, and three things break the day the seat goes dark — and here’s where we catch each one.

i.

The work dies with the tool.

Cancel the seat and the saved prompts, templates, and custom assistants go dark the same day. People rebuild them from memory, badly — or quietly keep the old tool on a personal login.

Caught by each person’s own guide
ii.

The one feature one person needed.

A tool looks redundant on the renewal sheet. But someone leaned on the single thing the replacement can’t do. You find out in week two, when their work quietly stops.

Caught by the tool-by-tool comparison
iii.

The quiet re-subscription.

Six weeks on, the expensed receipts start. The tool you switched off is back on three personal cards. Now you’re paying twice and you’ve moved no one.

Caught by checking adoption afterward

Your team’s move, handled in three steps.

01Check

See what carries over

Tell us which AI tools your team uses. In seconds, you see — tool by tool, in plain English — what would carry over to the new one and what wouldn’t.

02Move

Each person, guided

Invite your team. Each person gets a personalized, step-by-step guide built around how they actually work, so their prompts, projects, and setups land in the new tool.

03Confirm

It actually stuck

We check that your team is really using the new tool — so you didn’t just pay for seats nobody opens.

The same work, in the new tool.

Migrating isn’t copy-pasting chat history — it’s making sure each person can do their actual job on day one: same templates, same presets, same outputs. Examples of the moves we map:

JasperClaude

A content lead drafts blog posts in Jasper every morning — same tone presets, templates, and brand guidelines, loaded in Claude on day one.

OtterClaude Cowork

A sales team logged call notes in Otter after every meeting — same transcription and action items in Claude Cowork, one fewer subscription.

Custom GPTsClaude Skills

A marketer’s dozen Custom GPTs each become a Claude Skill — same prompts, same data sources, same outputs.

Salesforce EinsteinChatGPT

A RevOps team’s lead-scoring prompts and follow-up templates, rebuilt in ChatGPT and wired to the same CRM fields.

Canva AIClaude

A brand team’s campaign variations — brand kit, sizing presets, and copy blocks kept, now produced through Claude.

GleanClaude Cowork

An ops team’s search across wikis and tickets, running in Claude Cowork against the same connected sources.

Every move is built from the tools’ own documentation, dated, and re-checked regularly. New pairs are added every week.

See what overlaps, before you switch.

We grade every tool against the capabilities its category shares — so the one feature a person leans on doesn’t quietly vanish the day you consolidate. A few of the categories we map:

Dundie·Feature Parity MapSample

Chat assistants & LLMs

16 tools
Chat assistants & LLMs: capability support by tool. All chat, search the web, and read your files - they part ways on deep-research agents, persistent memory, and native image generation.
CapabilityChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityPoeMeta AI
Conversational chatFullFullFullFullFullFullFull
Web-grounded answersFullFullFullFullFullPartialFull
File & image analysisFullFullFullFullFullFullFull
Deep research modeFullFullFullFullFullNot availableNot available
Cross-session memoryFullFullFullFullPartialPartialFull
Image generationFullNot availableFullFullPartialFullFull
Hand-graded from each tool’s own docs, dated and re-checked.See the full grid — 15 categories →

Per-user pricing. No commitment, no surprises.

Free during beta

Right now the full migration is free — we’re onboarding a limited number of early teams. The prices below are what it will cost once beta ends; you won’t be charged during beta.

Audit
Free
Instant · no login · no commitment

See where your AI tools overlap and exactly what's safe to turn off — enough to know whether a migration pays off.

  • Self-serve stack intake — pick from a list, CSV, or screenshot
  • Overlap analysis across your tools
  • A breakdown with every claim you can check
  • No commitment required
Most popular
Migration
Freeduring beta
List price $49/user per migration · waived while we onboard early teams

The full migration: a short interview per person, a personalized guide each, verified adoption, and a board-ready completion report.

  • A short interview for each person who’s moving
  • A personalized, step-by-step guide per person
  • Day-7 and day-30 adoption checks
  • A board-ready completion report
  • Re-run anytime as your stack changes
Stack monitor
Coming soon
Planned: $500–$3,000/mo by org size

Ongoing watch on your AI stack: flags overlaps, alerts when a new tool shows up, and tracks the savings as subscriptions become safe to turn off.

  • Continuous stack ingestion
  • Overlap detection across the whole map
  • Alerts when a new tool arrives
  • Savings tracker tied to what you turn off
  • Quarterly stack review with our team

The objections we hear most often.

Doesn’t our SaaS-management platform already do this?
Tools like CloudEagle, Productiv, and Zylo show you what overlaps. They don’t get your people from one tool to the other. They handle inventory; we handle the migration that follows — the layer they explicitly punt on.
Won’t the vendors’ own import tools make this unnecessary?
Memory import and chat-history copy solve the technical layer. The hard layer is per-person workflow translation: how does a designer recreate her Custom GPT as a Claude Skill? How does a rep rebuild his Otter templates in Cowork? That’s what breaks migrations in real life, and it’s what we handle.
Why not just hire a consultancy?
Mid-tier consultancies charge $80K+ for a workshop-driven engagement and rebuild the same playbooks from scratch each time. Our library is already built and documented — which is why a migration is self-serve at $49/user list (free during beta), not a five-figure project.
What if our team uses a tool you don’t cover?
The map covers 500+ products and 1,700+ documented migration patterns today, and grows every week. When we don’t yet cover a pair, we build and document its patterns and add them to the map.
Do you touch our data?
No. We capture workflow descriptions through a short structured interview — not the underlying content of what people do in their tools. Your customer data, code, and records stay in your tools, where they belong.
How do you measure that it actually worked?
Per-person day-30 adoption, plus the dollars unlocked from subscriptions that became safe to turn off. Both go in the completion report, with the receipts.
Are you a reseller or partner of any AI vendor?
No. We take no referral fees, and we’re paid the same whether you land on Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot. We’d rather you turn off a subscription than buy a new one.

Explore the Feature Parity Map

Dundie·Get started

See what would carry over for your team.

Tell us your tools and we’ll show you, in seconds, exactly what moves to the new one and what doesn’t. No login, no sales call — and if something won’t carry over, we say so in writing before you switch.

Check your tools — free
Dundie — move your team to a new AI tool, without the mess