Move your team from GC AI to LegalOn.
Each person gets a short interview, then a personalized step-by-step guide showing exactly where their saved work, prompts, and projects land in LegalOn — and the few things that need a manual step, walked through. You send one invite; nobody becomes the help desk, and nothing in GC AI is changed or cancelled. Want to see where you’re paying for both first? Run the free audit.
GC AI's Skill Library and LegalOn's AI Assistant both provide AI-driven task execution for common in-house legal work (drafting, reviewing, summarizing), but the model is different. To move from GC AI to LegalOn: identify each skill or automation you rely on in GC AI (e.g., NDA review, DPA summaries, board consent drafting), then recreate the equivalent in LegalOn's AI Assistant as saved prompts — on the Teams plan, use the shared team prompt library so the whole team retains access. GC AI automations (scheduled workflows) do not have a direct equivalent in LegalOn Assistant; move recurring tasks to LegalOn's playbook-driven batch review instead. To move from LegalOn to GC AI: copy your prompt library entries as GC AI skills, attach them to the relevant contract types in the Skill Library, and chain skills where LegalOn used multi-step flows.
- Warning: GC AI skills improve through repeated use and can be chained into multi-step automations; LegalOn's AI Assistant does not offer a native skill-chaining or scheduling equivalent — teams running automated workflows will need to replicate those as manual steps or playbook-driven review cycles.
- Warning: LegalOn's Teams plan includes a shared prompt library; GC AI's shared skill library is also a Team/Enterprise feature — Individual plan holders on either side cannot share prompts or skills with colleagues.
- Warning: An 'Assistant Pro' add-on exists in LegalOn for expanded capability; confirm whether it is required to replicate the GC AI features you depend on.
Both tools embed into Microsoft Word and produce inline redlines, so the day-to-day review workflow looks similar on either side. To move from GC AI to LegalOn: install the LegalOn Word add-in, re-upload any contracts currently active in review as DOCX files (LegalOn accepts DOCX and PDF), and rebuild your playbook positions in LegalOn's plain-English playbook editor — LegalOn then auto-generates risk-flagged redlines aligned to those positions. To move from LegalOn to GC AI: install the GC AI for Word add-in (available on all plans), attach skills and playbooks to mirror the risk positions you had in LegalOn, and upload contracts via the web platform or directly within Word. Export tracked-change DOCX files from either platform before switching to preserve negotiation history.
- Warning: GC AI Individual starts at $500/month; LegalOn Individual starts at $550/month — verify current pricing before committing, as per-seat costs differ.
- Warning: LegalOn produces severity-tiered risk flags (Low/Medium/High) with a structured UI; GC AI returns clause-level risk commentary inline — teams accustomed to LegalOn's triage view will need to adapt their review workflow.
- Warning: GC AI supports both first-party and third-party paper through skill selection; LegalOn surfaces first/third-party paper handling explicitly via playbook configuration — confirm your standard paper type is mapped on the new side.
GC AI's Files feature and LegalOn's Vault both serve as in-platform document repositories, but LegalOn's Vault adds structured data extraction and analytics on top of storage. To move from GC AI to LegalOn: download all documents from GC AI's Files library (via the web platform) and re-upload them to LegalOn Vault; LegalOn will parse the contracts into structured data automatically and make them searchable. To move from LegalOn to GC AI: export contracts from LegalOn Vault (DOCX/PDF) and upload them to GC AI's Files feature. Note that GC AI's storage is scoped to individual conversations and team chats, while LegalOn Vault is a dedicated repository with folder-level access controls on the Teams plan — teams using Vault for compliance archival will find GC AI's file storage is less purpose-built for that use case.
- Warning: LegalOn Vault extracts analytics and business intelligence from stored contracts; GC AI's document storage is primarily a context source for AI conversations and does not offer contract analytics — teams that rely on portfolio-level data will lose that capability switching to GC AI.
- Warning: LegalOn's 'Contract Management' add-on unlocks expanded Vault capabilities beyond the base plan; confirm whether the add-on is in scope before quoting migration effort.
- Warning: GC AI does not publish explicit storage limits; LegalOn advertises unlimited search on both Individual and Teams plans — verify with each vendor whether storage caps apply to your volume.
Both products center contract review around reusable playbooks that encode the organization's preferred clause positions. To migrate from GC AI to LegalOn: export or document your existing GC AI playbook positions (preferred language, acceptable deviations, fallback positions) from the GC AI web platform, then recreate each position in LegalOn's plain-English playbook editor — LegalOn ships 50+ attorney-built playbooks you can use as starting templates and customize. To migrate from LegalOn to GC AI: use LegalOn's playbook editor to export or copy the plain-English clause positions, then enter those positions into GC AI's playbook creation flow, attaching them to the relevant skill types (NDA, DPA, etc.) in the Skill Library. Teams plan is required on both sides for shared-workspace playbook management; Individual plan limits playbooks to personal use.
- Warning: LegalOn ships 50+ pre-built attorney playbooks for common contract types; GC AI's Skill Library has pre-built skills for NDAs and DPAs but the pre-built coverage differs — audit which of your contract types have a matching template on the destination side.
- Warning: GC AI playbooks are tied to skills (which can be chained and automated); LegalOn playbooks are standalone positions that drive review and redlines — the concept of skill chaining has no direct equivalent in LegalOn.
- Warning: On both platforms, shared playbooks require the Teams plan; switching from Individual to Teams unlocks cross-team consistency but adds per-seat cost.
Both platforms are SOC 2 Type II certified and commit to not training models on customer data, so most enterprise security requirements carry across cleanly. When switching, obtain the new vendor's Trust Center artifacts (security reports, penetration test summaries) to satisfy InfoSec sign-off. GC AI's Trust Center is accessible at gc.ai/security; LegalOn's security documentation is at legalontech.com/security. For SSO, both require the Teams or higher plan — coordinate with IT to configure the new SSO integration (SAML/OIDC) before deprecating the old one. Confirm data-deletion procedures with the outgoing vendor: GC AI deletes on written request to security@getgc.ai; verify LegalOn's equivalent data-deletion SLA with their support team.
- Warning: GC AI holds SOC 2 Type I, Type II, and SOC 3 certifications; LegalOn holds SOC 2 Type II plus ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 27017:2015 — the certification portfolios differ, which may affect regulated-industry procurement checklists.
- Warning: GC AI uses APIs from multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, Google); LegalOn relies solely on Microsoft Azure OpenAI — teams with vendor-specific data-residency restrictions should confirm sub-processor geography with each vendor.
- Warning: LegalOn's 'Advanced Authentication' (beyond standard SSO) is a purchasable add-on; factor that cost into migration budget if MFA enforcement is a hard requirement.