Move your team from Ivo to Robin AI.
Each person gets a short interview, then a personalized step-by-step guide showing exactly where their saved work, prompts, and projects land in Robin AI — and the few things that need a manual step, walked through. You send one invite; nobody becomes the help desk, and nothing in Ivo is changed or cancelled. Want to see where you’re paying for both first? Run the free audit.
Ivo's AI Assistant answers contract questions, drafts clauses, and applies playbook-backed edits via natural-language prompts inside Microsoft Word. Robin AI's collaborative workspace provides an integrated AI chat and team-commenting environment inside its web editor. Both support conversational, AI-assisted contract work; the surface and scope differ. Moving from Ivo to Robin: teams that used Ivo's assistant for quick clause drafting and Q&A can run the same prompts in Robin's AI chat within the workspace — expect to retrain attorneys on a browser-based workflow rather than staying in Word. Ivo's assistant can retrieve external case law and statutes with citations; Robin's AI chat does not publicly document external legal database access, so teams relying on live statute lookup will need to retain a separate legal research tool. Moving from Robin to Ivo: re-establish team discussion threads in Ivo's Word add-in environment; Ivo does not expose a shared workspace discussion channel, so collaborative commenting previously in Robin's thread view will need to move to Word comments or a separate collaboration tool.
- Warning: Ivo's AI Assistant can access external legal databases to retrieve case law and statutes with citations; Robin AI's workspace AI does not publicly document this external legal research capability — teams dependent on in-workflow statute lookup must plan for a gap.
- Warning: Ivo operates inside Microsoft Word via an add-in; Robin runs in a dedicated web browser interface. Teams migrating in either direction must adjust their standard document workflow, including how contracts move between the AI tool and downstream signing or storage systems.
- Warning: Robin's collaborative workspace includes a searchable team discussion thread linked to each contract; Ivo does not expose an equivalent structured team-commenting feature — teams will lose this shared discussion history when migrating from Robin to Ivo unless they export it manually.
Both tools perform AI-driven contract review and produce tracked-change redlines; switching between them requires migrating review logic and exporting historical marked-up documents. Moving from Ivo to Robin: export Word documents from Ivo with tracked changes accepted or rejected as appropriate to preserve a clean baseline; upload those baseline contracts into the Robin workspace via bulk import; rebuild your playbook positions inside Robin's precedent library by uploading your internal standards documentation. Moving from Robin to Ivo: export contracts from Robin as Word files and open them in Microsoft Word (Ivo's primary editing surface); create Ivo playbooks from your Robin precedent library content; run a pilot review in Ivo on a representative contract to calibrate review accuracy before cutover. Note that Ivo operates inside Microsoft Word or Google Docs via an add-in, while Robin operates in its own browser-based editor — teams must plan for the workflow surface change accordingly.
- Warning: Ivo redlines run inside Microsoft Word or Google Docs; Robin redlines run in Robin's own web editor. Teams accustomed to staying in Word will need to adapt to Robin's browser environment or vice versa.
- Warning: Ivo's review logic is driven by playbooks with jurisdiction-specific and contract-type-specific fallbacks; Robin's review uses the precedent library as its guidance source. These structures are not directly importable — review positions must be rebuilt manually in the destination tool.
- Warning: Neither tool publicly discloses pricing tiers or per-document review limits, so cost impact at volume must be confirmed with each vendor's sales team before committing to a migration.
Both Ivo Intelligence and Robin AI provide natural-language search across a stored contract library without requiring manual tagging. Moving from Ivo to Robin: export all contracts from Ivo Intelligence (as Word or PDF files) and use Robin's bulk document import to re-ingest them into the Robin workspace. Robin automatically detects contract type, signatures, and key terms on upload, so no manual metadata entry is needed. Verify after import that amendment and restatement relationships are correctly identified, as Ivo explicitly groups related documents into unified views. Moving from Robin to Ivo: download contracts from Robin's workspace and import them into Ivo Intelligence, which also auto-discovers document relationships. Test natural-language queries against the migrated corpus on both sides to confirm recall quality before decommissioning the source repository. Ivo is documented to serve enterprise-scale libraries (Meta, Uber, IBM); Robin supports 200+ languages on upload, useful for multilingual portfolios.
- Warning: Ivo Intelligence automatically surfaces amendment and restatement relationships into a unified document view; Robin's search does not explicitly document this relational grouping feature, so complex amendment chains may need manual organisation after migration.
- Warning: Robin supports semantic search in 200+ languages; Ivo's language coverage for non-English contracts is not publicly documented — verify with the vendor before migrating multilingual portfolios to Ivo.
- Warning: Repository storage limits and export formats are not publicly disclosed by either vendor; confirm volume-export capabilities with each vendor's sales team before bulk migration.
Ivo organises review logic into structured playbooks (multiple overlapping playbooks per contract type, with jurisdiction and party-role scoping), while Robin AI uses a precedent library built from uploaded historical agreements. The core content — the firm's standard positions and approved fallback language — is the same; the packaging differs. Moving from Ivo to Robin: export your Ivo playbook documents (the source standards documentation used to build them) and upload them into the Robin precedent library as reference documents. Supplement with actual past agreements where available. Robin's AI will index clause positions and make them searchable for future reviews. Moving from Robin to Ivo: extract the internal standards documents and high-quality historical agreements from Robin and use them as input to build Ivo playbooks via natural-language prompts in Ivo's admin interface. Configure contract-type and jurisdiction scoping in Ivo to replicate the precedent coverage. Allow 1-2 weeks for iterative playbook tuning against test contracts before using in live matters.
- Warning: Ivo supports layering multiple simultaneous playbooks (e.g., MSA playbook plus DPA overlay) with automatic conflict resolution; Robin's precedent library is a flat document index. Teams relying on multi-layer playbook logic will need to flatten or restructure positions when moving to Robin.
- Warning: Ivo playbooks are configured with jurisdiction-specific fallback language; Robin's precedent library does not publicly document jurisdiction-scoping — verify this capability with Robin's sales team before migrating cross-border standard positions.
- Warning: Rebuilding playbook positions in either direction is a manual process that requires legal review; budget 2–4 weeks of legal team time for a thorough migration of complex playbook sets.
Both Ivo and Robin AI share a comparable security and compliance baseline: SOC 2 certification, ISO 27001 certification, GDPR compliance, and a no-training-data-on-customer-contracts policy. For teams switching between the two, the compliance posture is broadly equivalent and both platforms should pass standard enterprise security review. Migration steps are primarily administrative: obtain each vendor's most recent security certifications and pen-test reports from their trust portal (Robin's is at security.robinai.com; Ivo's available on request), review data processing agreements for any jurisdiction-specific differences, verify your data residency requirements against each vendor's hosting configuration, then issue a formal DPA with the new vendor before onboarding production contracts. Ensure that any security review already completed internally for the outgoing vendor is documented for audit trail continuity.
- Warning: Robin AI explicitly documents AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS in transit, AWS multi-region replication, and a public Trust Center at security.robinai.com; Ivo does not publicly disclose its encryption specifications or hosting infrastructure — teams with specific technical controls requirements should request Ivo's security documentation before committing to that platform.
- Warning: Neither vendor publicly documents private-cloud or on-premises deployment options; enterprises with data-sovereignty rules preventing SaaS hosting must confirm private deployment availability directly with each vendor.
- Warning: Ivo's SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications are listed on its public site but the scope of the SOC 2 report (Type I vs Type II, which trust services criteria are covered) is not disclosed — request the actual report before using Ivo in regulated industries such as financial services or healthcare.